AGENDA FOR THE RIF GENERAL ASSEMBLY. AUG 4
2005. TALLIN, ESTONIA.
a)
Hard
cover: 500 books = 16895 SEK, 1000 books = 19782 SEK
b)
Soft
cover: 500 books = 14295 SEK, 1000 books = 16732 SEK.
Notice that it is without the work of scanning
the pages into for example Publisher program.
a)
Limit
the number of members in each commission to three and clearly specify their
responsibilities and authorities in separate documents.
b)
Limit
Central Committee to five persons again (if it does not create any problems).
It has not been a problem for two years, but an even number could make
decisions difficult. Clearly specify their responsibilities and authorities in
separate documents for each position and the CC as a whole.
c)
Each
person in CC and the Chairman of each commission MUST send a monthly report (by
the 25:th) to the President about what activities that have been done. Even if
it is just a mail saying “Done nothing”. The President is then responsible to
put together a monthly report about what has been done this month. This can go
out with Newsletter and then reach all persons used to be in the commissions
before the suggested above change.
d)
In
addition to the Asian Commission, the Correspondence Commission, the Sports
Commission, the Referee Commission, the Youth Commission, the Rules Commission,
the Qualification Commission, the Translation Commission and the European
Commission, I want to add two more commissions:
1) The PR Commission. Suggested members
are Ando Meritee, Anders Henningsson and Irina Metreveli. This commission has the task to promote
RIF and Renju in different parts of the world.
2) The CC-Audit Commission. Suggested
members are Ants Soosorv, Marko Pellikka and Vladimir
Sushkov. They have to audit the performance of CC based on the monthly reports
sent out by the President and the general impression they have.
e)
I
also would like to make a plan for the coming two years for what activities
that need to be made. It should be approved by CC itself and the CC-Audit
Commission should audit the plan itself and how well it was followed.
a)
Team
World Championship 2006. Korea is candidate.
b)
World
Championship 2007. Tyumen, Russia is candidate.
c)
Asian
Championship
d)
Youth
World Championship
e)
European
Championship.
China is a candidate for one or more of the
tournaments a-d.
a)
Should
RIF continue to search for new opening rules?
b)
Should
RIF follow the decision made in Vadstena or should
RIF follow the proposal from Ando Meritee,
the Chairman of the Rules Commission?
Meritee’s proposal: “It means,
after GA 2005, all RIF member countries may send as many examples of
new rules to our commission as they wish, together with detailed description
and a "nickname" for easy usage. At December 31, 2005, the the list will be closed. It means, no more suggestions can
be added after that day. The idea of closing the list is to make people more
constructive, and focus on what we have by then, trying to make the best of it.
Our commission will
exclude from list all the suggestions of rules, which are in conflict with
basic principles of making rules (as Mr Tarannikov wrote 2 years ago). The
rules suggestions, which are acceptable by those criterias,
will stay in that list.
Then, in January 1,
2006, we will publish the list with rules which are appropriate and valid, and
all RIF countries can see them, and start discussing both nationally and
internationally. In 2006 TWC, the General Assembly could proceed with voting
among those listed candidates. Whatever vote gets a majority, will become a new
official opening rule, unless veto is used.
If veto is used by any
of founder members, then the whole process has to start over or even stopped.
If RIF decides to stop
the investigation and postpone it for unclear time, we can suggest all
renju sites (such as ORC, renju offline, gambler , LLIO site, etc) to take down
all alternative rules (sakata, tarannikov,
yamaguchi, and others) and continue with RIF official
rules only, until a new "start of investigation" is ordered by RIF.”
If we choose to continue the decision made at
GA 2003, it is necessary to decide maximum five CFOR (candidate for opening
rules)
Peter Jonsson,
President of RIF